Emergency Medical Services System Authorities
Posted by on Thursday, March 18, 2010
Under: Action
In the last 6 months or so, the operation of ambulance services has been a significant issue here in Blackfoot. The current operator of the ambulance - the Blackfoot fire department, has been unable/willing to operate within a budget and demanding additional money from the county. From what I understand, this is not an isolated incident. Bannock county has had similar issues with the Pocatello fire department.
The Senate Judiciary and Rules Committee will be considering a bill to mandate Ambulance system authorities. This bill would give fire districts an unprecedented ability to lock out other providers and drive costs up. Apparently the bill (S1391) has been extensively revised by the AIC (posted on the Idaho Fire Chiefs Association website).
As it is written now, the form of governance will be decided “by resolution of the majority of the cities and a majority of the fire districts within a county.”
Let me give you a hypothetical scenario if this bill passes. A county contracts with a private company to provide ambulance service to the county. With the passage of this bill, there would essentially be a vote to determine how and by whom ambulance service would be provided in the county. There could be 8 fire districts (as in Ada county) and a handful of cities. Even though none of these entities currently provide ambulance care, they each get a vote. Meanwhile, the county and the private ambulance company have no say in the process.
While the goal of coordination is admirable, it cannot be at the cost of competition and flexibility. Fire departments, while convenient, are rarely fiscally responsible. Our own experience in Bingham county bears that out. Under this bill, we would effectively be held hostage by the firefighters union demands.
Please take a stand for taxpayers and reject this bill that stifles competition and ensures higher costs.
The Senate Judiciary and Rules Committee will be considering a bill to mandate Ambulance system authorities. This bill would give fire districts an unprecedented ability to lock out other providers and drive costs up. Apparently the bill (S1391) has been extensively revised by the AIC (posted on the Idaho Fire Chiefs Association website).
As it is written now, the form of governance will be decided “by resolution of the majority of the cities and a majority of the fire districts within a county.”
Let me give you a hypothetical scenario if this bill passes. A county contracts with a private company to provide ambulance service to the county. With the passage of this bill, there would essentially be a vote to determine how and by whom ambulance service would be provided in the county. There could be 8 fire districts (as in Ada county) and a handful of cities. Even though none of these entities currently provide ambulance care, they each get a vote. Meanwhile, the county and the private ambulance company have no say in the process.
While the goal of coordination is admirable, it cannot be at the cost of competition and flexibility. Fire departments, while convenient, are rarely fiscally responsible. Our own experience in Bingham county bears that out. Under this bill, we would effectively be held hostage by the firefighters union demands.
Please take a stand for taxpayers and reject this bill that stifles competition and ensures higher costs.
In : Action




